claude-print/notes/bf-4lwr.md
jedarden d9c1c61954 docs(bf-4lwr): verify Status table reflects v0.2.0 reality
- Verified Status table in docs/plan/plan.md is correct
- All bead IDs validated (bf-46x exists; bf-40i/bf-52c removed)
- No changes required to plan.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-02 18:41:57 -04:00

26 lines
855 B
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# bf-4lwr: Status table verification for v0.2.0
## Date: 2026-07-02
## Verification Result
The Status table in `docs/plan/plan.md` already reflects the v0.2.0 reality correctly:
- **Phases 111 module implementation**: COMPLETE
- **main() session orchestration**: COMPLETE — references v0.2.0, no bf-40i reference
- **Binary-level E2E tests (AS-1, AS-2, AS-5)**: COMPLETE — references bf-46x (bf-52c removed)
- **AS-4 billing classification**: PENDING (manual verification)
- **CI release binary**: PENDING (awaiting tag)
## Bead ID Validation
Verified that all referenced bead IDs exist:
- `bf-46x`: EXISTS (Binary-level E2E tests)
No references to deleted beads found:
- `bf-40i`: NOT referenced (removed in v0.2.0)
- `bf-52c`: NOT referenced (deleted)
## Conclusion
The Status table is accurate and up-to-date. No changes were required.