docs(tb-29cx): document starvation alert resolution
Investigation revealed the alert was based on stale data. Current state: - 1 open bead (tb-5n9 with deferred label) - 1 in-progress (tb-29cx) System working correctly - bead worker properly skips deferred beads. Bead-Id: tb-29cx
This commit is contained in:
parent
329269c089
commit
9dff48ff32
1 changed files with 37 additions and 0 deletions
37
notes/tb-29cx.md
Normal file
37
notes/tb-29cx.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|||
# Starvation Alert Resolution (tb-29cx)
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Investigated a "Starvation alert: beads invisible to worker" alert. Found the alert was based on stale data — the system is working correctly.
|
||||
|
||||
## Investigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Alert Data (Stale)
|
||||
- Total beads: 40
|
||||
- Open: 8
|
||||
- In-progress: 1
|
||||
|
||||
### Actual State (2026-07-02)
|
||||
- Total beads: 46
|
||||
- Open: 1 (`tb-5n9` with labels `deferred, umbrella`)
|
||||
- In-progress: 1 (`tb-29cx` - this bead)
|
||||
|
||||
### Root Cause
|
||||
|
||||
The bead worker found no beads because:
|
||||
1. The only open bead (`tb-5n9`) has the `deferred` label — correctly signaling "don't work on this yet"
|
||||
2. The current bead (`tb-29cx`) was already claimed and in-progress
|
||||
|
||||
The 8 open beads referenced in the alert have since been processed/closed. The alert itself was stale, not a configuration error.
|
||||
|
||||
## Actions Taken
|
||||
|
||||
1. Verified current bead state via `sqlite3 .beads/beads.db`
|
||||
2. Confirmed `tb-5n9` has `deferred` label (correct behavior)
|
||||
3. Removed labels: `starvation-alert`, `deferred`, `failure-count:2`
|
||||
4. Updated bead notes with resolution findings
|
||||
5. Closing bead as resolved
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
No configuration error. The bead worker correctly skips `deferred` beads and already-claimed beads. System working as designed.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue