# Verification Note: pdftract-2qw5j (JSON Schema Generation) ## Task Summary Generate docs/schema/v1.0/pdftract.schema.json via xtask + schema gen CI gate ## Date 2026-05-28 ## Implementation Status: COMPLETE All components of the JSON schema generation system are implemented and working correctly. ## Verification Results ### PASS Criteria 1. **xtask gen-schema produces valid JSON Schema** ✅ - Binary: `xtask/src/bin/gen_schema.rs` - Command: `cargo run --manifest-path=xtask/Cargo.toml --bin gen_schema` - Output: `docs/schema/v1.0/pdftract.schema.json` (59,273 bytes) - Schema is valid JSON Schema Draft 2020-12 2. **Committed file matches generated output** ✅ - Running gen-schema produces byte-identical output to committed file - No diffs detected: `git diff --exit-code docs/schema/v1.0/pdftract.schema.json` - Stable sorting via `sort_keys_recursive()` function 3. **Schema includes required metadata** ✅ - `$id`: "https://pdftract.com/schema/v1.0/pdftract.schema.json" - `$schema`: "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema" - `title`: "pdftract Output v1.0" - `description`: Full description of extraction output structure 4. **Schema includes Phase 7 placeholder objects** ✅ - Empty arrays for Phase 7 features: `threads`, `attachments`, `signatures`, `form_fields`, `links`, `annotations` - All placeholder fields documented in schema descriptions 5. **Enum properties documented** ✅ - `page_type` includes "broken_vector" (per 5.1 + 6.1 requirement) - `confidence_source` field documented with allowed values - `severity` field documented with allowed values 6. **CI gate implemented** ✅ - Workflow: `.ci/argo-workflows/pdftract-ci.yaml` - Template: `schema-gen` (lines 1851-1940) - Enforcement: Regenerates schema, fails build on any diff - Error message includes reproduction command ## Schema Coverage The generated schema includes complete definitions for: ### Document-level - `Output` (root object) - `DocumentMetadata` - `ExtractionQuality` - `OutlineNode` (bookmarks) - `ThreadJson` (article threads) - `AttachmentJson` (embedded files) - `SignatureJson` (digital signatures) - `FormFieldJson` (form fields) - `LinkJson` (hyperlinks) - `JavascriptActionJson` (JS actions) ### Page-level - `PageJson` - `SpanJson` (text spans) - `BlockJson` (structural blocks) - `TableJson`, `RowJson`, `CellJson` (tables) - `AnnotationJson` (annotations) ### Diagnostics - `DiagnosticJson` - `ObjectLocationJson` ## Technical Implementation ### Rust Type Derives All relevant types have `#[cfg_attr(feature = "schemars", derive(schemars::JsonSchema))]`: - `Output`, `PageJson`, `SpanJson`, `BlockJson` - `DiagnosticJson`, `AnnotationJson`, `FormFieldJson` - All supporting types ### Stable Output - `sort_keys_recursive()` ensures deterministic key ordering - `BTreeMap` for all object keys - Pretty-printed with 2-space indentation ### CI Integration The `schema-gen` template in pdftract-ci.yaml: 1. Runs `cargo run --release -- gen-schema` 2. Compares output to committed file via `git diff --exit-code` 3. Fails build on any difference with clear error message 4. Part of quality-matrix (Tier-1 hard gate) ## References - Plan section: Phase 6.1 JSON Schema deliverable (line 2027-2045) - CI workflow: `.ci/argo-workflows/pdftract-ci.yaml` (template: schema-gen) - Generated schema: `docs/schema/v1.0/pdftract.schema.json` - xtask binary: `xtask/src/bin/gen_schema.rs` ## Notes - Schema generation is fast (~12 seconds cold build) - No warnings or errors during generation - Schema is committed to repo (not generated at build time) - This enables schema diffs to be reviewable in PRs - Schema $id uses pdftract.com domain (DNS already available) ## Enum Values (Clarification) The bead's "Critical considerations" section lists enum values that differ from the actual implementation: ### confidence_source enum - **Bead says:** `["vector", "ocr", "ocr-assisted", "ocr-fallback", "repaired"]` - **Actual (per plan line 363 and Rust code):** `["native", "heuristic", "ocr"]` - **Rationale:** The plan defines confidence_source as provenance of Unicode resolution (native PDF encoding vs heuristic recovery vs OCR). The bead's values appear to be from an earlier spec version. ### severity enum - **Bead says:** `["info", "warning", "error"]` (3 values, no "fatal") - **Actual (per Rust code and plan):** `["info", "warning", "error", "fatal"]` (4 values) - **Rationale:** The Rust `Severity` enum includes `Fatal` for extraction-aborting conditions (e.g., `ENCRYPTION_UNSUPPORTED`). The bead's omission of "fatal" appears to be an oversight. The current schema matches the plan and the Rust implementation. The bead requirements should be considered superseded by the plan specification. ## Retrospective ### What worked - The schemars crate integrates seamlessly with existing serde derives - CI gate provides clear error messages with reproduction steps - Stable sorting ensures deterministic output for diffs - Both GitHub Actions and ArgoCD workflows validate the schema ### What didn't - Bead requirements had outdated enum values that didn't match the plan - No technical implementation issues ### Reusable pattern - For similar schema generation tasks: use schemars + xtask + CI diff gate - Always use BTreeMap sorting for deterministic JSON output - Commit generated files (don't generate at build time) for reviewability - Verify bead requirements against the plan before implementation