docs(pdftract-2vd1y): verify JavaScript detection implementation
The JavaScript presence detection module was already complete in crates/pdftract-core/src/javascript.rs. Verified all acceptance criteria: - Catalog /OpenAction /S /JavaScript → detected - Page /AA /O /S /JS → detected - AcroForm field /AA /K /S /JavaScript → detected - Annotation /A /S /JavaScript → detected - /Next-chained actions → detected - Cyclic /Next → bounded by visited set - No JS present → returns false All 16 JavaScript tests pass. Created verification note documenting the implementation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
851439c6b1
commit
f9b3cbee76
1 changed files with 77 additions and 0 deletions
77
notes/pdftract-2vd1y.md
Normal file
77
notes/pdftract-2vd1y.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
|||
# pdftract-2vd1y — JavaScript Presence Detection
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The JavaScript detection module (`crates/pdftract-core/src/javascript.rs`) already implements complete JavaScript presence detection. All acceptance criteria pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Verified
|
||||
|
||||
### Public API
|
||||
- `contains_javascript(catalog, pages, acroform, resolver) -> bool` — lines 140-200
|
||||
- `detect_javascript(catalog, pages, resolver) -> (Vec<JavascriptAction>, Vec<Diagnostic>)` — lines 42-96
|
||||
|
||||
### Detection Sites (all covered)
|
||||
1. **Catalog /OpenAction** — lines 148-153
|
||||
2. **Catalog /AA** — lines 155-160
|
||||
3. **Page /AA** — lines 164-169
|
||||
4. **AcroForm field /AA** — lines 192-197 (recursive walk via `walk_field_for_js`)
|
||||
5. **Annotation /A or /AA** — lines 171-189
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Features Verified
|
||||
- **/JavaScript and /JS spellings** — line 237: `s_name == "JavaScript" || s_name == "JS"`
|
||||
- **/Next chaining** — `action_contains_js` recurses through /Next (line 244-247)
|
||||
- **Cycle protection** — `visited: HashSet<ObjRef>` prevents infinite loops (line 146, 215-218)
|
||||
- **Field tree recursion** — `walk_field_for_js` tracks `field_visited` separately (lines 336-386)
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Results
|
||||
```
|
||||
16 tests run: 16 passed
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_catalog_openaction: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_catalog_aa: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_page_aa: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_acroform_field_aa: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_annotation_with_action: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_empty: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_next_chain: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_cycle_protection: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_recognizes_js_short_form: PASS
|
||||
- test_contains_javascript_non_javascript_action: PASS
|
||||
- test_detect_javascript_empty: PASS
|
||||
- TH-04 integration tests (4): PASS
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria Status
|
||||
|
||||
| Criterion | Status | Test |
|
||||
|-----------|--------|------|
|
||||
| /OpenAction /S /JavaScript → true | PASS | test_contains_javascript_catalog_openaction |
|
||||
| Page /AA /O /S /JS → true | PASS | test_contains_javascript_page_aa |
|
||||
| Form field /AA /K /S /JavaScript → true | PASS | test_contains_javascript_acroform_field_aa |
|
||||
| Annotation /A /S /JavaScript → true | PASS | test_contains_javascript_annotation_with_action |
|
||||
| No JS → false | PASS | test_contains_javascript_empty |
|
||||
| /Next-chained action → true | PASS | test_contains_javascript_next_chain |
|
||||
| Cyclic /Next → no infinite loop | PASS | test_contains_javascript_cycle_protection |
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Quality
|
||||
|
||||
- **Documentation**: Clear module-level docs stating "pdftract NEVER executes embedded JavaScript"
|
||||
- **Error handling**: Resolves indirect objects safely, returns false on resolution failure
|
||||
- **Performance**: Early exit on first JS detection in `contains_javascript`
|
||||
- **Safety**: Separate visited sets for action chains vs field tree traversal
|
||||
|
||||
## Retrospective
|
||||
|
||||
### What worked
|
||||
- The implementation was already complete with comprehensive test coverage
|
||||
- Code follows the pattern described in the bead (recursive walker, cycle protection)
|
||||
- Both `/JavaScript` and `/JS` spellings are recognized
|
||||
|
||||
### What didn't
|
||||
- No issues encountered; implementation is complete
|
||||
|
||||
### Surprise
|
||||
- The module already had two functions: `contains_javascript` (bool) and `detect_javascript` (detailed actions). The bead asked for the boolean return which already exists.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reusable pattern
|
||||
- The cycle protection pattern (`visited: HashSet<ObjRef>`) is reusable for any recursive PDF structure walk
|
||||
- The separate `action_visited` and `field_visited` sets in `walk_field_for_js` shows how to handle nested recursive structures with different cycle domains
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue