docs(bf-5gjeo): verify ExtractionResult (TestExecutionResult) struct fields
Created verification note documenting: - TestExecutionResult struct at tests/encryption_fixtures.rs:189 - All required field accessors (exit_code, stdout, stderr, success) - Assertion methods for encryption test validation - Naming discrepancy note (bead refers to ExtractionResult, actual struct is TestExecutionResult) - Location and Debug derive verified Closes bf-5gjeo
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f2bd4ef3b
commit
5414214b67
1 changed files with 75 additions and 0 deletions
75
notes/bf-5gjeo.md
Normal file
75
notes/bf-5gjeo.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
|||
# Verification of ExtractionResult Struct Fields
|
||||
|
||||
## Task: bf-5gjeo
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding
|
||||
|
||||
The bead description refers to verifying an "ExtractionResult struct" with fields:
|
||||
- exit_code: Option<i32>
|
||||
- stdout: String
|
||||
- stderr: String
|
||||
- success: bool
|
||||
|
||||
However, after searching the codebase, I found that the relevant struct is actually **`TestExecutionResult`** (not `ExtractionResult`) located at `/home/coding/pdftract/tests/encryption_fixtures.rs:189`.
|
||||
|
||||
## TestExecutionResult Structure
|
||||
|
||||
**Location:** `tests/encryption_fixtures.rs:189`
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
```rust
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
|
||||
pub struct TestExecutionResult {
|
||||
/// The underlying process output
|
||||
pub output: std::process::Output,
|
||||
/// Optional fixture name for better error messages
|
||||
pub fixture_name: Option<String>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The struct wraps `std::process::Output` and provides methods to access the data:
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Methods (equivalent to the required fields)
|
||||
- `exit_code() -> Option<i32>` - Line 214
|
||||
- `stdout() -> String` - Line 218
|
||||
- `stderr() -> String` - Line 223
|
||||
- `success() -> bool` - Line 229
|
||||
|
||||
### Assertion Methods Available
|
||||
- `assert_stderr_contains(&str)` - Line 243
|
||||
- `assert_stdout_contains(&str)` - Line 255
|
||||
- `assert_exit_code(i32)` - Line 267
|
||||
- `assert_success()` - Line 282
|
||||
- `assert_failure()` - Line 294
|
||||
- `assert_output_contains(&str)` - Line 306
|
||||
- `assert_unsupported_encryption()` - Line 326
|
||||
- `assert_password_required()` - Line 351
|
||||
|
||||
## Other Related Structs Found
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`ExtractionResult`** (`crates/pdftract-core/src/extract.rs:237`) - Main PDF extraction result struct with fields: fingerprint, pages, metadata, signatures, form_fields, links, attachments, threads, javascript_actions. Not related to CLI testing.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`TestResult`** (`crates/pdftract-core/tests/TH-03-mcp-no-auth.rs:25`) - TH-03 specific test result with direct fields: passed, exit_code, stderr, stdout, bound_port.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- ✓ Struct exists with accessors for all 4 required values (via methods)
|
||||
- ✓ Field types are appropriate:
|
||||
- exit_code: Option<i32> ✓
|
||||
- stdout: String ✓
|
||||
- stderr: String ✓
|
||||
- success: bool ✓
|
||||
- ✓ Struct derives Debug for helpful test output ✓ (line 188)
|
||||
- ✓ Location documented: `tests/encryption_fixtures.rs:189`
|
||||
|
||||
## Naming Discrepancy Note
|
||||
|
||||
The bead and parent bead (bf-4wbf2) refer to "ExtractionResult struct" in the context of encryption test validation, but the actual struct that implements the assertion methods is `TestExecutionResult`. This appears to be a documentation/terminology discrepancy in the bead chain rather than a missing struct.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Structs in Test Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
Other test result structs found:
|
||||
- `FixtureResult` in `crates/pdftract-core/tests/encoding_recovery.rs:148`
|
||||
- `XrefTestResult` in `crates/pdftract-core/tests/xref_integration_test.rs:30`
|
||||
- `ClassificationResult` in `crates/pdftract-core/tests/classifier_corpus.rs:68`
|
||||
- `TestResult` in `crates/pdftract-core/tests/conformance.rs:58`
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue