4a3c05473e
Add comprehensive documentation comparing the two scaling dimensions: - Core distinction: N-change is lightweight (rendezvous hash), S-change is heavy (dual-hash dual-write) - Node scaling moves only ~1/N of documents; resharding affects 100% with 2× transient amplification - Decision matrix for operators to choose the right approach - Capacity planning guidance with S = max_nodes_per_group_ever × 8 formula - References to existing benchmarks and CLI schedule guidance This completes the remaining work for OP#3 by documenting the trade-offs so operators understand when to use resharding vs adding nodes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> Bead-Id: bf-jap1 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| dump-import | ||
| notes | ||
| plan | ||
| research | ||
| arm64-support.md | ||
| trade-offs.md | ||