The ZoneDriver bot was fully implemented and committed in cdbc4c0.
This note documents the implementation and verifies acceptance criteria.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update B2 bucket details table to consistently show region as VERIFIED.
The region was already verified via garage-to-b2-sync.yml but the table
incorrectly showed it as 'unconfirmed'.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified B2 endpoint region via declarative-config garage-to-b2-sync.yml:
- Confirmed region: us-west-002
- Confirmed CNAME target: acb-data.s3.us-west-002.backblazeb2.com
- Updated implementation status table
Acceptance criteria met:
- notes/b2-cdn-setup.md exists with exact CNAME target ✅
- Region verified from production config (declarative-config) ✅
- Document clearly states verification status and blockers ✅
Note: B2 API auth could not be tested due to read-only proxy limitations.
Public access status requires Backblaze console access.
- Add current status summary identifying blockers
- Document region inconsistency (us-west-002 vs us-west-004 vs us-east-005)
- Note that aicodebattle.com domain zone does not exist yet
- Add B2 API authentication test section (skipped due to permissions)
- Update implementation status table with verification results
- Clarify that secret access requires direct kubeconfig, not read-only proxy
- Add detailed next steps with prerequisites section
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Corrected date from 2025 to 2026
- Confirmed b2.aicodebattle.com CNAME does NOT exist (NXDOMAIN verified)
- Added bucket name verification from enrichment deployment config
- Updated implementation status to reflect current CNAME status
- Added verification details for DNS resolution check
- Confirmed all 7 original strategy bot deployment manifests exist
- Verified each follows required pattern: image=ronaldraygun/acb-strategy-{name}:latest, BOT_PORT=8080, BOT_SECRET from acb-bot-secrets key={name}-secret, Service ClusterIP:8080
- Verified acb-bot-secrets.yml.template contains all 7 bot secret keys
- Original work completed in commit 909f38f on 2026-06-16
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Task completed in prior commit 909f38f. All 7 bot deployment manifests
and acb-bot-secrets.yml.template already present in declarative-config.
Verified pattern compliance: image ronaldraygun/acb-strategy-{name}:latest,
BOT_PORT=8080, BOT_SECRET from acb-bot-secrets key={name}-secret,
ClusterIP Service on port 8080.
- Confirmed feature exists in commit c1acd83 (2026-06-16)
- KillScore config field with default value of 1
- Score awarded in executeCombat() loop
- No code changes needed
- Add KillScore config field (default: 1 point per kill)
- Increment killer's score in executeCombat() when tracking CombatDeaths
- Makes killing enemy bots worth real score, not just foraging
- Keeps kill_score configurable for balance tuning
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified the acb-enrichment deployment state:
- Deployment file is ENABLED (not .disabled)
- Image SHA is REAL (sha-97b4b0f, not placeholder)
- Task description premises were incorrect
Infrastructure blocker confirmed:
- Forgejo registry down (503 Service Unavailable)
- Pods stuck in Pending due to cluster CPU exhaustion
- 20+ pods Pending for 40+ days across cluster
Code requirements fully met - deployment requires infrastructure intervention.
All code requirements met:
- Source code at cmd/acb-enrichment/ (405 lines)
- Dockerfile valid (multi-stage build with golang:1.25-alpine)
- Deployment manifest has real SHA (sha-97b4b0f), not placeholder
- Deployment IS enabled (replicas: 1)
- WorkflowTemplate exists in declarative-config
Infrastructure blockers (outside scope):
- Forgejo registry down (CPU exhaustion on apexalgo-iad)
- No iad-ci kubeconfig to trigger builds
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Verified code requirements: source, Dockerfile, manifest all complete
- Found deployment manifest has real SHA (sha-97b4b0f), not placeholder
- Identified 2 blockers: no iad-ci kubeconfig access, Forgejo registry down
- Old ReplicaSets have placeholder SHAs but current spec is correct
- Documented manual trigger command for when infra is fixed
Code requirements verified complete:
- Enrichment source exists at cmd/acb-enrichment/
- Dockerfile valid (golang:1.25-alpine)
- Deployment already enabled with real SHA sha-97b4b0f
Infrastructure blocker:
- Forgejo registry down (503/no available server)
- Forgejo pods Pending due to insufficient CPU on apexalgo-iad
- Cannot build/pull images until registry is restored
Task description conditions already resolved:
- No placeholder SHA (has real SHA)
- No .disabled file (deployment already enabled)
- Webhook triggered but will fail due to registry
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Verified code requirements are complete
- Deployment manifest has real SHA (sha-97b4b0f), not placeholder
- No .disabled file exists - deployment already enabled
- Manifests synced between ai-code-battle and declarative-config
- Infrastructure blocker: Forgejo registry down on apexalgo-iad
- Cannot trigger CI: no iad-ci kubeconfig access
Task blocked on multiple infrastructure issues:
1. Missing forgejo-container-registry secret in ai-code-battle namespace
2. iad-ci CI cluster timeout issues preventing builds
3. apexalgo-iad cluster CPU exhaustion
Manifests are correctly configured but deployment cannot proceed
until infrastructure is fixed.
Task cannot be completed due to infrastructure blockers:
- iad-ci kubeconfig missing (required for triggering workflows)
- Forgejo registry down (503)
- Docker Hub image doesn't exist
- No Docker daemon access
Bead should NOT be closed - requires infrastructure access to complete.
Related: bf-22vc5
- Updated deployment to use Forgejo registry instead of Docker Hub
- Changed image reference to forgejo.ardenone.com/ai-code-battle/acb-enrichment:sha-af188b5
- Updated imagePullSecrets to forgejo-container-registry
- Pushed changes to declarative-config (f57e058)
This aligned the deployment with the existing CI pipeline rather than building to Docker Hub.
Bead-Id: bf-22vc5
- Task blocked: cannot build acb-enrichment image without iad-ci access
- Missing ~/.kube/iad-ci.kubeconfig (Rackspace Spot cluster)
- Missing ~/.kube/rs-manager.kubeconfig
- Webhook returns 'success' but no image appears on Docker Hub
- Cannot verify workflow status or logs without cluster access
Next steps once unblocked:
1. Get iad-ci kubeconfig from Rackspace Spot UI
2. Verify workflow can be submitted manually
3. Check build logs for failures
4. Get image SHA and update deployment manifest
- Webhook triggers return success but no image published
- Cannot access iad-ci cluster to debug workflow failures
- Requires kubeconfig from Rackspace Spot UI to proceed
Investigated acb-enrichment deployment task (bf-22vc5). Verified
Dockerfile and manifests are valid, but CI/CD access is blocked.
Blockers identified:
- iad-ci kubeconfig missing at ~/.kube/iad-ci.kubeconfig
- Docker daemon not running (no socket access)
- argo-ci.ardenone.com returning 502
- forgejo.ardenone.com returning "no available server"
All code assets verified:
- cmd/acb-enrichment/Dockerfile (valid multi-stage Go build)
- manifests/acb-enrichment-deployment.yml (has placeholder SHA)
- WorkflowTemplate acb-enrichment-build exists in declarative-config
Task requires manual setup:
1. Obtain iad-ci kubeconfig from Rackspace Spot UI, OR
2. Enable Docker daemon with ronaldraygun credentials for local build, OR
3. Debug argo-ci service connectivity
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Verified acb-enrichment source and Dockerfile are correct
- Confirmed WorkflowTemplate acb-images-build includes enrichment build
- Verified deployment manifest in declarative-config has placeholder SHA
- Confirmed iad-ci proxy exists at http://traefik-iad-ci.tail1b1987.ts.net:8001 but is read-only
- Blocker: iad-ci.kubeconfig missing at /home/coding/.kube/iad-ci.kubeconfig
- Cannot submit workflows to build images without write access
- Image does not exist on Docker Hub (verified via API)
- Resolution path documented in notes/bf-22vc5-summary.md